Unqualified Offerings

Looking Sideways at Your World Since October 2001
« « Technical Difficulties | Main | Time to Get Serious! » »

October 5, 2005

Hope for the Republic Yet Dept.

90-9! It is a bittersweet victory indeed when the country’s senior legislative body has to reaffirm the settled laws of war, basic human decency and the Army’s own existing field manual and customs – that the question even arises is dispiriting. But the available alternative to a bittersweet victory here was not unalloyed triumph but simple defeat. I’ll take the win, thank you.

And yes, I made my calls. I’m sure I didn’t need to, given my representation in the Senate, but it felt good.

UPDATE: Roll of Shame forthcoming. The Senate has to update its website.

And on the “don’t get too excited” front, there’s an important tidbit buried in the Reuters report:

[McCain] said he was concerned the detainee regulations could be weakened or stripped from the bill when a final version is worked out in a conference with the House of Representatives.

Alaska Republican Sen. Ted Stevens, chairman of the Defense Appropriations subcommittee, said he would press for some changes in the amendment in the conference because he said it could imperil undercover operatives.

It’s been SOP with this Congress to stack the conferences that reconcile the House and Senate versions of passed legislation and modify bills both to the President’s liking and in ways that could never have survived a full Congressional vote. Right now we have a trophy. We could still end up with a gutted carcass.

UPDATE UPDATE: Matt Weiner lists the Nine in comment two, below. The scurviest nonet since the Black Sox scandal.

Posted by Jim Henley @ 10:32 pm, Filed under: Main

« « Technical Difficulties | Main | Time to Get Serious! » »

7 Responses to “Hope for the Republic Yet Dept.”

  1. Comment by Zack
    October 5, 2005 @ 10:43 pm

    Who are the 9?

  2. Comment by Matt Weiner
    October 5, 2005 @ 11:13 pm

    Allard, Bond, Coburn, Cochran, Cornyn, Inhofe, Roberts, Sessions, Stevens.

  3. Comment by Hesiod
    October 6, 2005 @ 12:29 am

    None of whom are up for reelection, I note.

  4. Comment by Jim Henley
    October 6, 2005 @ 12:33 am

    Damn. That means they voted to preserve American torture out of conviction.

  5. Comment by Ginger Stampley
    October 6, 2005 @ 6:47 am

    Wow. And I can remember thinking at one point that Cornyn had a shred of decency over some of the death penalty stuff he’d done as Texas AG. So much for that.

  6. Trackback by Redwood Dragon
    October 6, 2005 @ 11:54 am

    Nazgul in the Senate

    Ememies of humanity who voted in support of torture: Allard (R-CO) Bond (R-MO) Coburn (R-OK) Cochran (R-MS) Cornyn (R-TX) Inhofe…

  7. Comment by Camera Obscura
    October 6, 2005 @ 1:48 pm

    Ah, good old Senator Gasbag, er, Bond. Sorry. Can’t do a damn thing with him, and Unions keep re-electing him because he likes to jump up and down and bluster on telly whenever a major manufacturer tries to close a plant here.

    I tried to keep Ashcroft out of Congress by voting for a dead guy, and you saw how that turned out. You’d never know Heinlein was from this state.

  8. (Comments automatically closed after 21 days.)