Unqualified Offerings

Looking Sideways at Your World Since October 2001
« « Flyy Paper (sic) | Main | New WINEP from Old Vines » »

April 16, 2006

The Djerejian Plan

The Times of London says that the US and Iraqi governments – once there is an Iraqi government – are going to launch a major “clear, build and hold” operation in the Iraqi capital by sometime late summer. This is essentially the plan Greg Djerejian has been advocating recently.

Its boosters call the proposed operation “the second liberation of Baghdad.” Incurably dubious of government rhetoric, I find myself having a strangely comforting thought. “The Second Liberation of Baghdad” has marketing slogan written all over it, but that’s the part that cheers me up. The proposed TSLOB timetable (unfortunate acronym) means that, if it either goes well or could be made to appear to go well, it would tend to boost the President’s popularity and Republican electoral prospects heading into the fall elections. And that means the Administration may be pinning its hopes on TSLOB instead of an October Surprise over Persia. They can’t relish trying to calm Baghdad down while Iran explodes.

On the substance of the plan, I suspect it will prove to be more whack-a-mole – the Baathists and Sadrists and Badrists currently rampaging through Iraq have other places they can go, and we’ll have to strip US and Iraqi troops from other parts of the country to pull this off. The relative success of recent operations in Tal Afar serve as a model for TSLOB, but if we pull troops out of Ninevah to “liberate Baghdad (again),” Tal Afar itself could slide back toward insurgent control. And there’s this:

Vines’s replacement as commander of ground forces is Lieutenant-General Peter Chiarelli, who pioneered the use of force with Sweat [“sewage, water, electricity and trash”] to subdue Sadr city, a working-class Shi’ite district of Baghdad, in 2004. On the eve of his return to Iraq this year he described how the tactics had worked and vowed to repeat them.

“It was not uncommon for the 1st Calvary Division to be engaged in intense urban combat in one part of the city, while just a few blocks away we had units replacing damaged infrastructure, helping to foster business growth or facilitating the development of local government,” Chiarelli said.

Which is great, but as you may have read, a lot has happened in Sadr City since 2004. It was “subdued” for a bit, and Baby Sadr’s militia has shied from direct attacks on Americans since then, but Sadr City remains a Shiite militia-controlled badlands. We may liberate Sadr City yet again (it would probably count as Liberation Number Three), but for how long. Will we really get from Clear to Build and eventually Hold, or will something come up undoing whatever progress TSLOB makes?

That’s my bet. Against that, I’ll say, if you really think the US needs to continue its share of the war in Iraq, TSLOB may be the best option you’re left with. It will provide a good test of my reflex pessimism. I hope the Iraqis themselves appreciate their chance to contribute to Science.

Posted by Jim Henley @ 12:42 am, Filed under: Main

« « Flyy Paper (sic) | Main | New WINEP from Old Vines » »

6 Responses to “The Djerejian Plan”

  1. Comment by ASteele
    April 16, 2006 @ 7:28 am

    I like how the plan is to liberate Baghdad from the badr-brigade, and the mahdi militia, which as far as I can tell, are essentially the goverment of Iraq. So, we’re liberating Iraq by destroying the only troops loyal to the elected goverment, yea, liberating.

  2. Comment by Nicholas Weininger
    April 16, 2006 @ 4:17 pm

    The ”1st Calvary Division”?

    Well, I guess those soldiers do all have their crosses to bear…

  3. Comment by Chester
    April 17, 2006 @ 7:11 am

    Good job thanks! Best wishes to owner of this site!

  4. Comment by ash
    April 17, 2006 @ 1:39 pm

    ”if it either goes well or could be made to appear to go well, it would tend to boost the President’s popularity and Republican electoral prospects heading into the fall elections. And that means the Administration may be pinning its hopes on TSLOB instead of an October Surprise over Persia. They can’t relish trying to calm Baghdad down while Iran explodes.”

    (I wonder if this comment will get eaten?)

    Dude! They’re not going to fight the Iranians in the fall! They’re going to fight the Iranians in the spring! They’re going to do the run up to fighting the Iranians in the fall, which involves no actual combat because that turns off voters. Pimping for a proposed war is essentially costless, since no money or fighting is involved.

    They can do these operations sequentially. The Baghdad op will be just like the ops from Fall 2004, when we went on a new, ”tremendously successful” offensive every week or so, or so it seemed.

    And it’s going to work, too, because the House of Bush is evil, corrupt, and stupid…and the Democrats are evil, corrupt, stupid…and suicidal.

    ash

    [’At least it will be entertaining.’]

  5. Comment by Jim Henley
    April 17, 2006 @ 1:41 pm

    Crap!

  6. Comment by Tom Hilton
    April 17, 2006 @ 6:02 pm

    Personally, I’m looking forward to the 17th Liberation of Teheran. Because I have a feeling that’ll be a particularly good one.

    Don’t the neocons have this thing about eternal warfare? Well…looks like that’s what they’re set on giving us.

  7. (Comments automatically closed after 21 days.)