Unqualified Offerings

Looking Sideways at Your World Since October 2001
« « To Hell With The Fourth Amendment | Main | To Stop Chewing This Glass Bottle Would Show Weakness to the Terrorists » »

August 11, 2006

Fear is Dick Cheney’s Beloved Mindkiller[Edited]

(Posted by Mona)
*
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye
to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.
Frank Herbert, Dune
*
U of Chicago Law Professor, Cass Sunstein, examines mortality salience and the social science that suggests foiled terrorist attacks being in the news is good for Republicans:
A paper by Mark Landau and his colleagues, in 30 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1136 (2004), offers some intriguing clues. Here are two key findings. (a) After people are merely reminded of their own mortality (by being asked, for example, to describe “what you think will happen to you as you physically die and once you are physically dead”), they show stronger support for President Bush and his policies in Iraq. (b) After people are reminded of their mortality OR of the 9/11 attacks, they become more favorably disposed toward President Bush and less favorably disposed toward John Kerry.
Sunstein goes on to surmise from the study what Karl Rove well knows:
The upshot is that any reminder of the terrorist threat is likely to help President Bush, and probably to help Republicans generally, even (and here is the important fact) to the extent of causing a shift in their direction among moderates and some liberals. It remains to be seen if Democratic leaders can cause a change in the underlying dynamics.
The GOP is fully aware of the dynamic Sunstein addresses, and Glenn Greenwald, guest-blogging for Tim Grieve over at Salon’s War Room, explores how (no permalink, and an ad to endure) Bush Co. and its supporters have rushed to exploit the foiled British terrorist plot, for the political gain they make whenever fear is in play:
Glenn “Instapundit” Reynolds excitedly points to this terrorist plot and then claims that “some people” — he does not, of course, say who these “some people” are — “have decided that the war on terror is passe. But although you may not be interested in terrorism, terrorism is still interested in you.”

…And one popular right-wing blogger who writes anonymously behind the name “Ace of Spades,” actually insisted that this event all at once demonstrates the wisdom of warrantless eavesdropping by the National Security Agency, the Patriot Act, Guantánamo military tribunals and torture (only to then casually recant all of that once it was pointed out to him that it was British law enforcement agents, not Americans, who foiled the plot).

The White House is sure to follow suit any minute now… Each time a new plot is disclosed, administration officials and their followers immediately begin squeezing the emotions and fears generated by such events for every last drop of political gain they can manufacture.

Exactly right (altho I quibble over applying the word “excitedly” to the passive-aggressive Reynolds). And, as Greenwald predicted about the Bush Administration with regard to exploiting fear in the context of the foiled airliner plot  — to the rather petulant ridicule of certain Bush-defending libertarians — it took Dick Cheney no time to begin the drumbeat of “terrorists win when Democrats do” about the Lieberman primary defeat, only the day before Greenwald wrote those words on Thursday [edited for clarity]:
“The al-Qaida types, they clearly are betting on the proposition that ultimately they can break the will of the American people in terms of our ability to stay in the fight and complete the task,” Cheney said in a telephone conference call with reporters on Wednesday from Jackson, Wyo…. Cheney said the Democrats’ embracing of Lamont and his position on Iraq after he won the primary showed that the party had become isolationist and unconcerned about terrorism.”And when we see the Democratic Party reject one of its own [Joe Lieberman], a man they selected to be their vice presidential nominee just a few short years ago,” Cheney said, “it would seem to say a lot about the state the party is in today if that’s becoming the dominant view of the Democratic Party.
To which Ned Lamont responds:

“Both the (Republican National Committee), Dick Cheney and Joe Lieberman seem to be reading off the same playbook right now,” Lamont said. “But I don’t think it’s going to stick.”

One can only hope, if we are to see the Democrats take a house of Congress and restore balance and checks to our federal government. But as Sunstein’s social science demonstrates, the GOP holds a potent weapon in mortality saliency, and hence in terrorism. There’s no indication that party won’t continue to manipulate the public with this weapon, and every reason to suspect it will.

Posted by Mona @ 9:43 pm, Filed under: Main

« « To Hell With The Fourth Amendment | Main | To Stop Chewing This Glass Bottle Would Show Weakness to the Terrorists » »

5 Responses to “Fear is Dick Cheney’s Beloved Mindkiller[Edited]”

  1. Comment by DonBoy
    August 11, 2006 @ 10:52 pm

    “But although you may not be interested in terrorism, terrorism is still interested in you.”

    Is it insulting the audience to point out that Reynolds is here appropriating an evangelical slogan, with “terrorism” substituting for “God”?

  2. Comment by Thoreau
    August 11, 2006 @ 11:09 pm

    What really gets me is that it seems so transparent. It seems so obvious to me that they’re just playing on fear. Because scare tactics are so effective, and because everybody knows this, you’d think that more people would see through it. Yeah, it works, but everybody knows that it works.

    Maybe this is one of those “Do they know that we know that they know that we know?” things.

  3. Comment by Andrew Olmsted
    August 12, 2006 @ 5:22 pm

    Don,

    I can’t speak to what Glenn was thinking, but I first heard that quote as being from Leon Trotsky: “You may not be interested in strategy, but strategy is interested in you.” Trotsky may well have been bastardizing the God quote, I don’t know, but I’d never heard it used with God until you referenced it.

  4. Comment by Keith_Indy
    August 13, 2006 @ 1:07 pm

    Except, of course, that the same rhetoric was being spouted even before Tuesday and the outcome of the Lieberman/Lamont primary was not certain.

    And if you want to talk fear, the Democrats do it, just on different issues.

    The familiar refrain would be, Republicans are anti-abortion, homophobic, racist, and gonna steal grandma’s retirement money.

  5. Comment by Uncle Kvetch
    August 14, 2006 @ 4:13 pm

    After people are merely reminded of their own mortality (by being asked, for example, to describe “what you think will happen to you as you physically die and once you are physically dead”), they show stronger support for President Bush and his policies in Iraq.

    The Party of Death.

  6. (Comments automatically closed after 21 days.)