Unqualified Offerings

Looking Sideways at Your World Since October 2001
« « Music Notes | Main | Reading Sabbatical -McNamara’s Mea Culpa » »

April 30, 2007

Alberto Gonzales takes charge in Iraq

…but he swears he has no recollection of ordering any of the firings:

BAGHDAD, April 29 — A department of the Iraqi prime minister’s office is playing a leading role in the arrest and removal of senior Iraqi army and national police officers, some of whom had apparently worked too aggressively to combat violent Shiite militias, according to U.S. military officials in Baghdad.

Since March 1, at least 16 army and national police commanders have been fired, detained or pressured to resign; at least nine of them are Sunnis, according to U.S. military documents shown to The Washington Post.

Although some of the officers appear to have been fired for legitimate reasons, such as poor performance or corruption, several were considered to be among the better Iraqi officers in the field.

Your daily dose of sectarian violence.

Posted by Thoreau @ 7:57 am, Filed under: Main

« « Music Notes | Main | Reading Sabbatical -McNamara’s Mea Culpa » »

3 Responses to “Alberto Gonzales takes charge in Iraq”

  1. Comment by Nell
    April 30, 2007 @ 11:22 am

    Beauty title and post, Thoreau.

    {Sigh.}

  2. Comment by Tom Scudder
    April 30, 2007 @ 11:27 am

    Considered by whom to be among the better officers? (Apparently, by American officials & officers). Interesting use of the passive voice.

  3. Comment by Michael H.
    April 30, 2007 @ 6:13 pm

    Considered by whom to be among the better officers? (Apparently, by American officials & officers). Interesting use of the passive voice.

    Clearly American officials and officers if you read past the lead and synthesize a few of the elements in the article.

    We have Col. Ehrich Rose, “chief of the Military Transition Team with the 4th Iraqi Army Division,” who offers this about the Iraqi army:

    “The Iraqi army, as far as capability goes, I’d stack them up against just about any Latin American army I’ve dealt with,” he said. “However, the politicization of their officer corps is the worst I’ve ever seen.”

    So one established baseline for what makes the army good or bad is its politicization. It follows that non-political officers are better soldiers:

    Maj. Gen. Husayn Jasim Abd al-Awadi is a Shiite who was “assessed as combating militia influences” in his work with the national police, but three Iraqi generals said he would be replaced and all “agreed that Dr. Bassima played a role in the decision to fire” him, according to a separate U.S. military document marked secret.

    Another national police battalion commander, Col. Nadir Abd Al-Razaq Abud al-Jaburi, has been “known to pass accurate and actionable intelligence” about the Mahdi Army, the report said, adding that U.S. military officials describe him “as professional, non-sectarian, and focused on gaining support of the populace.”

    And there are several anonymous sources, including “a senior U.S. military official,” “a senior Iraqi army official,” and “a U.S. official” all grousing throughout the story.

    So it’s an absolutely uninteresting use of the passive voice. Probably should have been sharpened up a bit, but the writer might have come up under an editor who’d forgive constructions like that if it kept the lead lean and was handled further down where there’s room for expounding. Not unheard of. Had one myself. Seems clear to me the author took out the garbage adequately later down the article.

Leave a Reply