Unqualified Offerings

Looking Sideways at Your World Since October 2001
« « We’ve got spirit! Yes we do! We’ve got spirit! Go Team Blue! | Main | I’ll meet you guys half-way » »

November 3, 2007

In Which I Am Lame and Old

31 points out of 58 on Rolling Stone’s “Almost Impossible Rock & Roll Quiz,” which makes me a “Whiz,” proving they grade on a curve.

Posted by Jim Henley @ 10:42 pm, Filed under: Main

« « We’ve got spirit! Yes we do! We’ve got spirit! Go Team Blue! | Main | I’ll meet you guys half-way » »

21 Responses to “In Which I Am Lame and Old”

  1. Comment by John O
    November 3, 2007 @ 11:13 pm

    26, though I guess on at least half.

    I’ve always been good at this stuff, though.

  2. Comment by AC
    November 3, 2007 @ 11:26 pm

    38. Obsessively reading the All Music Guide is apparently worth something.

  3. Comment by Happy Jack
    November 3, 2007 @ 11:33 pm

    37, but once I hit the ’90’s I could have called it a day.

  4. Comment by Minipundit
    November 3, 2007 @ 11:40 pm

    40. Same reason as AC.

  5. Comment by Brett Peters
    November 3, 2007 @ 11:48 pm

    34 for me, which came as quite a surprise. Definite curve.

    I especially liked the Tupac/Seagal section; reminded me of classic Brunching Shuttlecocks quizzes like “Porn Star or My Little Pony?” and “Christian Heavy Metal Band or Star Trek: Next Generation Episode?”

  6. Comment by Craig Richardson
    November 3, 2007 @ 11:57 pm

    9, proving that I’m under 40 – except that I just turned 41. When did Rolling Stone get more un-hip than me?

  7. Comment by Kieran
    November 4, 2007 @ 12:06 am

    This is a bad test instrument, because I got 32, and to be quite honest I know fuck all about music. I was just trying to intelligently guess pretty much the whole way.

  8. Comment by Eric the .5b
    November 4, 2007 @ 1:22 am

    24, myself. Weak, and I don’t see much of a pattern to the ones I got or missed, beyond that I got a couple of very trivial ones in the 80s and 90s.

    (I purely guessed the Zeppelin runes, though I should have gotten the “Sloop John B” match-up.)

  9. Comment by Eric the .5b
    November 4, 2007 @ 1:25 am

    I especially liked the Tupac/Seagal section

    Yup, that was clever. :)

    Anyone know whether Rolling Stone is worth reading, anymore? I got sick of it in the mid 90s (after getting into it in the early 90s, to be fair).

  10. Comment by dHerblay
    November 4, 2007 @ 3:11 am

    42. I feasted on the sixties, and then picked up what I could where I could. But, goddamnit, there were more Isley Brothers than that.

  11. Comment by Sean
    November 4, 2007 @ 8:17 am

    I myself am sitting pretty on 43.

  12. Comment by Jim Henley
    November 4, 2007 @ 9:43 am

    From you, I’d have epected no less, Sean!

  13. Comment by Chris
    November 4, 2007 @ 10:33 am

    They definitely grade on a curve. I answered two questions correctly, got bored and skipped to the end, and was given a score of 7. DON’T Y’ALL GET COCKY.

  14. Comment by matthew hogan
    November 4, 2007 @ 11:26 am

    32 –but age closer to Henley.

    Mostly educated guesses but did know a few.

  15. Comment by Mary
    November 4, 2007 @ 11:34 am

    Holy crap, how did I get 35? I had to guess a hell of a lot.

  16. Comment by Nell
    November 4, 2007 @ 12:56 pm

    there were more Isley Brothers than that.

    Got that right. A well-designed test would have had checkboxes rather than radio buttons, with a bonus for getting all of them and no non-Isleys:

    Only gospel devotees over 60 would be able to name Vernon, so a fair test would leave him off. But the Isleys who performed the early hits were O’Kelly, Rudolph, and Ronald. Ernie and Marvin were Phase 2 (in the rock-test framework).

    That question is one of the five or six I didn’t guess the answers to; got an unearned 26.

  17. Comment by Joshua Holmes
    November 4, 2007 @ 1:49 pm

    29. That’s what I get for not listening to anything made after the year of my birth.

  18. Comment by Anna in PDX was Cairo
    November 4, 2007 @ 7:01 pm

    26, which also is a “whiz” – and I was not even expecting to get that as I guessed on the vast majority of the questions. And I am 39, so I should have at least got all the 80s ones but did not.

  19. Comment by Matt Schiavenza
    November 4, 2007 @ 9:34 pm

    36, at age 26, which proves all those dorky teenage years obsessively reading liner notes paid off for something. Or not.

  20. Comment by cleek
    November 5, 2007 @ 9:56 am

    31 here.

    damn, that was some obscure shit.

  21. Comment by Eric Martin
    November 5, 2007 @ 11:21 am

    43, but I must have gotten lucky with some guess work somewhere.

    But apparently I know my Bowie from my Bambaataa.

  22. (Comments automatically closed after 21 days.)