Meta Things
1. This is amusing.
2. It may be a bit opaque to people who don’t read Marginal Revolution regularly.
3. But you can probably get it from context.
Overall, I incline toward 1 and 3.
1. This is amusing.
2. It may be a bit opaque to people who don’t read Marginal Revolution regularly.
3. But you can probably get it from context.
Overall, I incline toward 1 and 3.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | Jan » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) |
Comments (RSS) |
Valid XHTML |
Valid CSS
Theme: Bricks 1.0

This theme is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Comment by mds —
December 6, 2007 @ 10:31 am
Okay, now all we need is for Marginal Revolution to include a link to this post in another numbered list, and the false vacuum of the entire metaverse will collapse.