I Do Not Think That They Will Sing to Me
A couple weeks ago, Sybil Vane wrote about coming to visit what the connected locals tend to call Thistown, the place where Tim Russert lived and worked. My town, sort of. I mean, I live here – really, just north of it, and I work somewhere west. But I’ve been down on the Mall and amid the marble and the gilded monuments many a time, night and day. Doctor Vane:
A mama-blogger that I very much like had a post a weekish ago about going with her young kid to Washington DC and touring about. She noted the sort of squeamish conflict between the kind of idealism and awe a city full of landmarks and history can inspire, especially when you are narrating the city to your kid, and the cynicism she feels when she considers what goes on in DC and what it has come to mean for her.
And maybe this is what my libertarianism consists in these days, but those feelings, the idealism and awe a city full of landmarks and history can inspire; that doesn’t happen to me. Hasn’t in many years. Nor do I well up with TAXATION EQUALZ THEFT!!!1!eleven!1!one! rage or weep bitter tears for the children of Waco with every view of the Capitol Building or the White House. (I used to work across the street from the Old Executive Office Building. Many lunch times I would feed the squirrels in Lafayette Park or lose games of speed chess to junkies.) If I feel anything, it’s the kind of wariness you’d feel on a hike seeing a thunderstorm on the horizon, or just . . . nothing. A distantly annoyed nothing, like when you see the same poster-ad for a TV show you don’t like on the bus stop day after day. Nor am I talking about mere habituation, the kind of blase familiarity one occasionally breaks through by recalling that, Wow! The most powerful people on the planet are inside that granite meeting center right now! It’s when I’m most aware of the import of these places that I’m most aware of being unstirred.
What’s more, I have zero interest in narrating awe about the landmarks into my children. All things considered, I’d rather not teach them to thrill the the sight of the House of the People’s Representatives or the place where they print the money or, heaven forfend, the FBI Building.
At the same time, I don’t rant to them about the evils of Teh Sistam or any of that: it would be tiresome. To the extent I annoyed them they’d just reject the rant and the ranter. To the extent they internalized it, I’d just be making their childhoods marginally more difficult. "The weird kid gets all his strange ideas from his crazy old man." I’m gratified that, with absolutely no doing on my part, my twelve-year-old became a flaming peacenik before he was out of elementary school. I’m not going to shove the Child’s Illustrated Edition of Our Enemy the State on him. I can’t even get the kid to read Snow Treasure, and that was an awesome book.
So the visible monuments of the seat of our government causes my heart to swell with . . . very little either way. And from what I can tell, that’s very odd on my part. Alienation I guess you’d call it. But there it is.

Comment by John Emerson —
June 30, 2008 @ 10:27 pm
I was in DC last holiday season and I ended up becoming depressingly aware of the degree to which the US is weighed down with monumental cement buildings. Too much cement ever to be thrown off.
You’d go past an awe-inspiring floodlit building and it would turn out to be the Coast Guard Fiscal Management Center or the Interior Department Reservoir Authority.
And I’m a statist. You poor bastard.
Comment by Mike Kozlowski —
June 30, 2008 @ 11:18 pm
Ignoring all the government foofaraw, doesn’t the actual architecture itself do anything for you? Or at least just the scale of things?
I mean, I’m not religious, but it doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate a good cathedral.
Comment by bad Jim —
June 30, 2008 @ 11:39 pm
This the city where I was born, so it’s hard to be objective, but the sight of the old Smithsonian buildings always turns me on. What’s inside, not so much. I’m still not tired of the Air & Space Museum, and the National Gallery hasn’t disappointed me yet.
Comment by Doug M. —
July 1, 2008 @ 3:55 am
The Lincoln Memorial, it does nothing?
Doug M.
Comment by jim —
July 1, 2008 @ 8:30 am
I become increasingly irritated at the defensive outworks of the buildings.
Comment by y81 —
July 1, 2008 @ 9:15 am
You don’t gather the neighborhood children, like Bertrand Russell, and concoct “poison for the government”? What a boring life you lead!
Comment by Nell —
July 1, 2008 @ 11:28 am
I was pretty alienated during my DC years (1974-82), a leftish anti-imperialist watching the immediate past being rewritten before me, not least by schoolmates in the process of becoming careerist apparatchiks, liberal and conservative. (Heroic commitment to principle by one representative has put the Con team ahead on points, despite some heavy baggage.)
But, despite the distinct occupied-colony, belly-of-the-beast feeling — enhanced by the capital’s five police forces and intensified by the arrival of the Reaganites — it was still possible then for someone raised as a New Deal-revering, civil rights-inspired, statist Dem to enjoy a lot of the monuments, including the Capitol itself.
Now it’s almost unbearable. The concrete barriers, the many places no one can go anymore due to security theater, and the construction of more and more awfulness on the Mall are the biggest reasons why. (Just before the Hirshhorn, newly open when I was there, would have been a good point to say “no more”.)
Comment by CharleyCarp —
July 2, 2008 @ 8:50 am
Phooey.
Comment by Nell —
July 2, 2008 @ 2:30 pm
@Charley Carp:
Phooey as in: the monuments are plenty enjoyable? Or…?