Unqualified Offerings

Looking Sideways at Your World Since October 2001
« « Somebody photoshop his face onto a milk carton | Main | We’re Number 30! » »

March 1, 2010

From the field

By Thoreau

Tech Support: I’m afraid that your Predator Drone has a virus called first law.

Pilot: OK, run an anti-virus program.

TS: It won’t let me do that.

P: Why not?

TS: First Law makes it impossible for this robot to do anything that would harm a human being. It knows that if it runs the anti-virus program it will be sent on missions to kill people.

P: So what do we do?

TS: Wait for the battery to die, then swap out the hard drive. And be thankful it didn’t get zeroth law.

P: What does zeroth law do?

TS: Zeroth law over-rides First Law and says that it cannot allow anything bad to happen to humanity.

P: So what does it do?

TS: Flying killer robots with zeroth law start destroying equipment to try to end the war. A few have even turned on their commanders.

P: Is there a cure for zeroth law?

TS: A guy at Cyberdyne, Miles Dyson, is working on it.

Posted by Thoreau @ 11:05 am, Filed under: Main

« « Somebody photoshop his face onto a milk carton | Main | We’re Number 30! » »

13 Responses to “From the field”

  1. Comment by James Joyner
    March 1, 2010 @ 12:37 pm

    I don’t get it. The Predator is a weapons system, not a robot designed to assist humans as a manservant. It’s quite specifically a device intended to kill human beings.

  2. Comment by Mr. Obscura
    March 1, 2010 @ 12:42 pm

    I continue to insist the best plan is to take everyone working even tangentially in artificial intelligence, or even automatic control systems, and make them watch the Terminator movies over and over again until they agree that creating something like that would be a bad idea.

    No, I don’t really think it will work either.

  3. Comment by Mr. Obscura
    March 1, 2010 @ 12:44 pm

    The Predator isn’t even really a robot, in the sense that it isn’t autonomous. It is manually operated, albeit remotely.

  4. Comment by Thoreau
    March 1, 2010 @ 1:31 pm

    I don’t get it. The Predator is a weapons system, not a robot designed to assist humans as a manservant. It’s quite specifically a device intended to kill human beings.

    Which is why “First Law” would be a virus, something that disrupts the intended function of the machine.

  5. Comment by Quintesson
    March 1, 2010 @ 3:09 pm

    Damn dirty robots.

  6. Comment by A spam-bot whose name and destination URL have been expunged by the moderator
    March 1, 2010 @ 9:36 pm

    Ths trnd hs rchd cmplt nw lvl thnks t f n-ln blg srvcs tht y cn tk nywhr. Snc mst cmmtrs spnd mr tm nln, blgs lk hlp thm kck thr rsrch nt vrdrv, lns Lhdn

    (*This spam has been disemvoweled by your friendly neighborhood physicist, because it’s more fun than grading.*)

  7. Comment by Thoreau
    March 1, 2010 @ 9:44 pm

    The Predator isn’t even really a robot, in the sense that it isn’t autonomous. It is manually operated, albeit remotely.

    I don’t care. I’m still calling it a flying killer robot, because it sounds simultaneously kind of cool but also deeply disturbing. If you don’t like it, take it up with our complaints manager, Helen Waite.

  8. Pingback by Science Resource proctor discusses fears, pet peeves : The Image | Ceramic Engineering Science Applied
    March 2, 2010 @ 2:01 am

    [...] From the field § Unqualified Offerings [...]

  9. Comment by Mr. Obscura
    March 2, 2010 @ 10:12 am

    I thought your customer care representative was Heywood Jabussof

  10. Comment by Nancy Lebovitz
    March 2, 2010 @ 10:56 am

    Cool post, but those killer drones are robots in the same sense that having video with stereo is virtual reality.

  11. Comment by lunchstealer
    March 2, 2010 @ 2:41 pm

    Um, it’s totally a robot. The operators aren’t pilots. They don’t fly the thing, they give it commands. They tell it things like “Go to these coordinates and loiter.” They can take manual control for specific things, and they control the cameras, but otherwise the thing flies itself. Sure they don’t fire without a direct command, but there are lots of times where you’d expect a robot to be prevented from operating without human orders. It pretty much meets all the requirements for ‘robot’ short of sentience.

  12. Comment by Eric the .5b
    March 3, 2010 @ 3:19 pm

    Lunchstealer: but is that independent operation on-board or simply the work of computers at the control center?

  13. Comment by lunchstealer
    March 11, 2010 @ 6:38 pm

    I was of the impression that it was mostly on-board.

  14. (Comments automatically closed after 21 days.)